Skip to main content

PACS and DICOM Workflow

PACS issues often feel mysterious because images pass through several systems before a study is complete. A workflow view makes troubleshooting much easier.

The usual chain

  1. A modality creates images and study metadata.
  2. DICOM data is sent to one or more destinations.
  3. Intermediate systems may route, normalize, cache, or reconcile data.
  4. PACS stores the study and serves it to viewers.
  5. Other systems such as RIS, reporting, teaching files, or cloud archives may depend on the same identifiers.

Systems commonly involved

  • Modalities and modality worklists
  • RIS or scheduling systems
  • DICOM routers or gateways
  • PACS archive and viewer platforms
  • Identity, networking, and storage infrastructure

Questions that quickly narrow the problem

  • Did the modality create the study correctly?
  • Did the transmission leave the modality?
  • Did a router reject, hold, or rewrite the data?
  • Did PACS ingest the study but fail to display it as expected?
  • Is the problem tied to one modality, one AE Title, one site, or one date range?

Failure patterns worth recognizing

  • Worklist issues usually show up before image acquisition
  • Routing or networking issues often affect transmission timing or destination reachability
  • Identifier mismatches can create split exams, duplicates, or missing priors
  • Storage or viewer issues may appear only after the study has already arrived somewhere downstream

A practical engineering checklist

  • Capture AE Titles, IP addresses, ports, and timestamps
  • Preserve at least one example accession number or study UID
  • Check whether the issue affects current exams only or historical retrieval too
  • Confirm whether images are missing entirely or present in one system but not another
  • Write down the first known good time and first known bad time